Peer Review Process

Manuscripts submitted to the Scholics Journal of Management and Commerce undergo a peer review process.

Initial Checks 

  • Experienced editors review all submissions to ensure proper preparation, adherence to the journal’s ethical policies, and inclusion of required disclosures. 
  • References are verified for accuracy; incomplete, unsuitable, or unclear ones may result in desk rejection. 
  • Articles are evaluated for English language quality, with authors potentially asked to use a native or professional editor for improvements. 
  • Plagiarism screening is conducted on every submission. 
  • Improperly prepared manuscripts are sent back to authors for corrections and resubmission. 
  • Submissions lacking originality, containing major scientific or technical errors, without a key contribution, or not following journal guidelines face rejection without peer review.

Peer Review 

Manuscripts passing initial checks enter a double-blind peer review by at least two anonymous experts in the relevant field.

Editorial Decision and Revision 

  • Decisions incorporate all reviewer feedback, with the Editor-in-Chief making the final call, possibly after consulting additional specialists. 
  • Authors must address every reviewer and editor comment point-by-point in their response letter, clearly explaining any disagreements.